Tuesday, June 07, 2005
Two Views On Inflation & Housing Bubbles
Both of these articles appeared within the last few days in the Washington Times. This one paints a rosy picture of a Fed Banker inplying that inflationary pressures have largely been controlled and that the Fed is nearing the end of its tightening (rate-hiking) cycle:
One very noteworthy observation in this article is the differential between rental prices and housing prices. Rental prices are going down compared to housing prices:
Consumers probably have 1 to 3 years to sell out of these areas if they have bought recently. When housing costs collapse, condos and apartments take the bulk of the hit while stand-alone housing retains far, far more of its value. So if you have been in your house for 3 to 5 years, you are a lot safer. However, if you have bought into a townhouse complex, a condo in one of these high-growth areas, my advice is to look to bail ASAP.
One thing you should understand about the following articles is that mortgage info doesn't capture large-pool housing investment purchases, and at least in some areas of the country these are growing rapidly. Commercial investors often work with rolling credit lines and never get mortgages. This is particularly common during the last stages of a housing bubble, during which time these companies and investment consortiums only expect to hold their properties for 3 to 6 months (refurbishments and fixer uppers) to 3 years (price appreciation and apartment complex conversions). Flipping (rapid purchase and resale) has been a concern of some of the federal agencies for several years.
See Sfgate
The Tennessean
NAR
NAR Research
NAR (No signs of slowdown)
April EHS (mortgage rates dropping)
GlobeSt.com:
The Fed has raised its target rate since June 2004 from 1 percent to 3 percent. Mr. Fisher seems to imply it would go to 31/4 percent and hold there at least several months. This is exceptionally good news for the investor class and the economy. To be sure, Mr. Fisher is hardly speaking from left field. The indicators soundly back him up.So now turn to this article on consumer costs by Patrice Hill:
The oil-price shock has not spilled over into nonoil or nonenergy price increases. The core consumer spending deflator (excluding food and oil) -- Alan Greenspan's favorite price measure -- has been steady at only 1.6 percent growth over the last eight months.
What's more, sensitive commodity and market-price indicators that tend to lead inflation have turned down with a vengeance. This includes gold, raw materials and Treasury-bond rates. Meanwhile, the difference between long- and short-term interest rates, known as the slope of the Treasury yield curve, has narrowed substantially, though it still remains positive and normal. These are all signs inflation is contained and well within the Fed's target range.
The much-watched Consumer Price Index (CPI) has doubled to 3.5 percent since 2002, fed mostly by higher energy prices. The pace of increase in the last three months was faster still at 6.2 percent, according to the Labor Department, which publishes the index....IMO the government is and has been playing with its indicators:
The influence of global disinflationary forces is most evident in the falling prices for imported goods, such as technology and clothing. Computer prices, for example, dropped by 16 percent in the last year, while women's apparel prices fell by 1.8 percent.
Lower costs overseas also work indirectly to keep a lid on prices in the United States, particularly by holding down labor costs in industries that compete with China and other nations where the cost of labor is only a fraction of U.S. levels.
Labor costs, which constitute as much as two-thirds of a business's overall expenses, have been particularly subdued since the 2001 recession. Many American workers have been getting no raises at all, or wage gains that are less than the rate of inflation.
The institute contends that the department's methods are suspect because they were instituted at a time when the Clinton administration and Congress were looking for ways to cut the budget deficit. Political leaders viewed the price adjustments as an unobtrusive but powerful way to save the government money.I would say the second article should not be ignored. The supermarket index (my own) is way, way up, and it is showing disturbing signs that the lower 1/2 of consumers are utterly tapped out. Cheaper brands are appearing on store shelves and certain items, like coffee, are being sold at vastly disparate prices in different stores (meaning that they are being used as draws, and that consumers are utterly sensitive to these incentives).
The price index is used to determine inflation adjustments each year in Social Security and other government-benefit programs that constitute a big and growing share of the federal budget.
One very noteworthy observation in this article is the differential between rental prices and housing prices. Rental prices are going down compared to housing prices:
Recently, the cost of rent has fallen dramatically as a percentage of a home's price — an unusual development that economists say could be evidence of a price bubble in the housing market.Investors are buying residential properties en masse in the fast-growing markets not for their income-producing value, but because they expect to profit from the escalation in housing costs. They will rent for whatever they can get as a way of minimizing their carrying costs. If investors are buying the properties, and if there is not enough demand for rentals to allow them to raise rental costs that much, it means many urban markets are experiencing a housing bubble. These indicators look bad overall. In fact, they look like about 1986 or 87. By 2008 or 2009 we should be experiencing a pretty severe recession.
Normally, the annual cost of rent should be between 6 percent and 10 percent of the home price, according to John P. Calverley, chief economist at American Express Bank.
Last year, the ratio of rental income to home prices dropped to 3.5 percent nationwide and was even lower in areas of the East and West coasts — including Washington — where housing inflation has been the highest.
Consumers probably have 1 to 3 years to sell out of these areas if they have bought recently. When housing costs collapse, condos and apartments take the bulk of the hit while stand-alone housing retains far, far more of its value. So if you have been in your house for 3 to 5 years, you are a lot safer. However, if you have bought into a townhouse complex, a condo in one of these high-growth areas, my advice is to look to bail ASAP.
One thing you should understand about the following articles is that mortgage info doesn't capture large-pool housing investment purchases, and at least in some areas of the country these are growing rapidly. Commercial investors often work with rolling credit lines and never get mortgages. This is particularly common during the last stages of a housing bubble, during which time these companies and investment consortiums only expect to hold their properties for 3 to 6 months (refurbishments and fixer uppers) to 3 years (price appreciation and apartment complex conversions). Flipping (rapid purchase and resale) has been a concern of some of the federal agencies for several years.
See Sfgate
The Tennessean
NAR
NAR Research
NAR (No signs of slowdown)
April EHS (mortgage rates dropping)
GlobeSt.com:
The purchase of investment homes last year was up 14% over the prior year, representing the purchase of about 1.8 million homes. Add this to the sales of second homes, mix in the investment/vacation home market, and that activity amounts to more than a third of the total current home-sales market. So, who is buying what, and for what purpose?I am preparing a risk assessment for home equity loans/revolving lines of credit as required by the recent interagency guidance on home equity loans. I will try to post something useful for individuals next week. In the meantime, look at NAR's No Sign of Slowdown article that contains these statistics:
There’s also anecdotal information that points to the potential for a bursting bubble. A recent news report suggests that flipping low-priced homes is on the increase in that city. Property values in Buffalo are among the lowest in the country, and the report indicates most of the flipping is done by out-of-town investors, including some from as far away as California.
How are they able to buy and sell so easily and quickly from so far away? Answer: the Internet, which adds an entirely new dimension to potential bubble development. The report even suggests some homes have been bought and sold on eBay.
A rise in speculationEveryone is worried about rate risk - that's why the huge increase in ARM's. April EHS:
“Speculation is not dominating the market, although it is on the rise,” Lereah says. Despite the increase, he adds that most residential real estate purchases are rational.
High home price-to-income ratio
“The home price-to-income ratio is alarmingly high, especially in California, rising from 23 percent in 2003 to 32 percent in 2004,” says Lereah.
Increased use of ARMs
In the past year, ARMs have made up 30 to 40 percent of mortgage loans, when they should actually be around 25 percent. “The increase in the use of adjustable rate mortgages at a time when fixed mortgage rates are at historic lows is troubling.”
Regionally, the home resale pace in the South jumped 7.4 percent from March to a record annual rate of 2.74 million units in April, and was 8.3 percent higher than a year ago. The median price of an existing home in the South was $176,000, which was 8.0 percent higher than April 2004.This can't continue. It just can't.
Total existing-home sales in the Midwest rose 5.8 percent to a record annual rate of 1.64 million in April, and were 3.8 percent above April 2004. The median price in the Midwest was $166,000, up 12.9 percent from a year earlier.
Existing-home sales in the Northeast increased 4.3 percent to a record annual pace of 1.20 million units in April, and were 7.1 percent above the level of a year ago. The median existing-home price in the Northeast was $243,000, up 15.2 percent from April 2004.
Existing-home sales in the West held even at an annual rate of 1.61 million units in April, and were 2.5 percent higher than April 2004. The median existing-home price in the West was $305,000, up 21.0 percent from the same month a year ago.
Comments:
<< Home
OK, I'm at a loss. If there is a steady job market and even job creation, how can there be a bubble burst?
The housing market is just that- a market responding to supply and demand.
In markets with growth in terms of jobs and/or expanding economy, why would that bubble burst?
The housing market is just that- a market responding to supply and demand.
In markets with growth in terms of jobs and/or expanding economy, why would that bubble burst?
It's all just speculation, isn't it?
;)
There's been alot about a coming bubble burst. Maybe in particular areas, like the Midwest, we could end up seeing one.
One of the things that I think must have some influence is that investors pulled away from the stock market and haven't really put much money back in... that means there is alot of investment money out there somewhere. Real estate has been touted as the way to go, and perhaps that can keep it growing... when the experts can't agree it is anyone's guess.
The government plays with statistics because it can.
What you see on grocery shelves is the cutthroat competition of the food sector. They are trying to widen the profit margins if they can while the basic costs for commodities are going up.
Gold and raw materials are tied to China it appears. So I don't know if you can read American markets by those.
I can't say I really understand what is going on. I sort of gaze over information that comes out. With more than a little interest, because it is up to me to get some retirement funds established for my husband and I.
He is something of Peter Pan, ok? that is OK, cause I am a cross between Captain Hook and Tink.
( just imagine that for a sec ;)
;)
There's been alot about a coming bubble burst. Maybe in particular areas, like the Midwest, we could end up seeing one.
One of the things that I think must have some influence is that investors pulled away from the stock market and haven't really put much money back in... that means there is alot of investment money out there somewhere. Real estate has been touted as the way to go, and perhaps that can keep it growing... when the experts can't agree it is anyone's guess.
The government plays with statistics because it can.
What you see on grocery shelves is the cutthroat competition of the food sector. They are trying to widen the profit margins if they can while the basic costs for commodities are going up.
Gold and raw materials are tied to China it appears. So I don't know if you can read American markets by those.
I can't say I really understand what is going on. I sort of gaze over information that comes out. With more than a little interest, because it is up to me to get some retirement funds established for my husband and I.
He is something of Peter Pan, ok? that is OK, cause I am a cross between Captain Hook and Tink.
( just imagine that for a sec ;)
I know my grammar slipped- don't laugh
BTW, they had anarticle on the housing markets most likely to stay strong and those most likely to go bust. NY was on the bust list, and Atlanta was on the strong list.
BTW, they had anarticle on the housing markets most likely to stay strong and those most likely to go bust. NY was on the bust list, and Atlanta was on the strong list.
SC&A - because of demographics and employment that isn't really expanding. One of the reason that having illegal aliens in such numbers working in the economy is so bad is that for the most part they can't buy. You have more people retiring in the next 10 years. You have real declining wage earnings in the bottom 1/3 of the economy. All of that reduces expected demand in the future. Exactly how much varies from place to place.
Eventually the markets will balance all that out. When you get a bunch of investors buying residential properties, it's a signal that price adjustments are pending because demand is higher than it normally would be. All of this is local to some extent of course. But prices up 15% in the NE in one year? That's kind of frightening.
I'm looking for confirmation, but I heard a rumor that almost half of the residential sales in the DC area in the last year were to investors.
Captain Hook(!), the supermarket is a great index because it is incredibly responsive and cutthroat. Supermarkets try to maximize their profit for every square foot of shelf space. They get computerized inventory returns to adjust their buys. They would prefer to sell slightly more expensive brands because they give a better profit, so when they start introducing store brands/cheaper brands they are doing so because customers won't or can't buy what they normally carry. Moving the cheaper brands faster gives them more profit.
Manufacturing does appear down somewhat worldwide.
The south is gaining population. However, banks started getting stung up around the Atlanta area a couple of years ago on interest only loans with walkaways. Some local RE markets suffer from fixed supply such as in the Portland area. Tight zoning has produced soaring prices in many areas. Risks will vary greatly by locale.
Post a Comment
Eventually the markets will balance all that out. When you get a bunch of investors buying residential properties, it's a signal that price adjustments are pending because demand is higher than it normally would be. All of this is local to some extent of course. But prices up 15% in the NE in one year? That's kind of frightening.
I'm looking for confirmation, but I heard a rumor that almost half of the residential sales in the DC area in the last year were to investors.
Captain Hook(!), the supermarket is a great index because it is incredibly responsive and cutthroat. Supermarkets try to maximize their profit for every square foot of shelf space. They get computerized inventory returns to adjust their buys. They would prefer to sell slightly more expensive brands because they give a better profit, so when they start introducing store brands/cheaper brands they are doing so because customers won't or can't buy what they normally carry. Moving the cheaper brands faster gives them more profit.
Manufacturing does appear down somewhat worldwide.
The south is gaining population. However, banks started getting stung up around the Atlanta area a couple of years ago on interest only loans with walkaways. Some local RE markets suffer from fixed supply such as in the Portland area. Tight zoning has produced soaring prices in many areas. Risks will vary greatly by locale.
<< Home