.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}
Visit Freedom's Zone Donate To Project Valour

Friday, May 06, 2016

Employment Report, April

This one's a bit of a puzzle. We have the sharp divergence of the Household Survey vs the Establishment Survey. Neither are particularly good: Establishment came in at 160K, whereas Household came in at -316K. 

The two-month (Feb to April) Household number is +70K, for an average +35K per month. 

Establishment is showing a much better number for those two months at +184K per month. There were downward revisions to the previous two months totaling -19K. 

I do think the Household Survey picks up trend shifts (both positive and negative) earlier than the Establishment Survey. Adjusting for the higher error ratio in the Household gives an unreconcilable -50K per month, so I would hazard that in the future the Establishment Survey will be revised down. The Employment/Population ratio dropped from 59.9 to 59.7 in Household.

Looking at Table A-8, it appears to me that some of the big Household Survey swing is actually due to weather- and calendar-induced SA perturbations. So I do not foresee a sudden drop-off in employment in the near future, although I think employment weakness will slowly become more obvious by July.

I am not surprised by the weakness, because FUTA has been forecasting it. 

I still believe that the US entered recession in March. I still believe, however, that the US economy has been Europeanized to the extent that this one will have a European-style trajectory - very slow and long. 

April rail figures for intermodal freight were notably poor:

The air is slowly leaking out of this expansion, and I really don't see what will redress it. There is time, but barring sudden fiscal stimulus, the weakness will continue to very slowly drag down the economy.

Looking at grocery stores, it appears to me that a price correction is underway. I expect the inflation rate to begin dropping sharply. This may help on the consumer side. 

Both auto and housing sales are showing clear signs of weakening trends over the last few months. These trends have not yet impaired production, but when they do later in the year (or whenever managements begin to cut spending), we will see more traditional recession signs.

This is still a business-led downturn, and those do not have a sudden effect on employment. Inventories are too high, still. This is not going to rebalance on its own.

The dollar is weakening in response to recent data, but global growth trends are not very strong, and it will be hard for US manufacturing to pick up on export orders even with a weaker dollar.  

Addendum & Note: 
The theory that the strong employment of the last few years is enough to keep us from a consumer participation in a weak business cycle is rather stupid. If one looks at the longer term, this has been a stunningly poor expansion in terms of jobs:
  
The population has grown but full-time jobs are only a few million more than they were before the previous recession. There is literally not enough in the system to support housing values and rents; there is a limit to what credit can accomplish. 

People are running up their credit cards again, but this has a natural end:
 
  

Comments:

...and ACA compliance costs continue to increase apace. Can't wait to see the premium and out-of-pocket increases for this fall's registration period.

 
Well, Neil, they are changing the rules so people can't sign up after moves. You have to wait until the annual enrollment.
 


Charming. Well, there's short-term coverage, although that won't save you from the mandate "tax".

Not that the mandate is likely to work. In my location, both premiums and deductibles have gone up by 10% each year like clockwork. I don't see how that can be anything other than a death spiral.

 
Neil - that's why we have elections - it gives the Democrats an excuse to blame the Republicans. Of course it's a death spiral!!

The thing was always DOA.
 

I have noticed an interesting dynamic that may slow the spiral. Out of curiosity, I went poking around the various health insurance websites again, fooling with location, age, and income. I noticed that where subsidies a couple of years ago started at about $75K income for a family of four, the "8% of income" clause has kicked in, and the family of four now gets significant subsidies at over $95K income.

The plans have gotten so expensive that any further premium increases are an ersatz income tax, not a change in premiums per se. There's no subsidy for the deductibles, of course, and they're going up at the same rate. But most people are going to be somewhat cushioned from premium increases.

 
I don't know if there are going to be any insurance companies left in the Oregon market. We had Health Republic at work. They pulled out in December so they went with Lifewise. Lifewise is pulling out of the market this December. I don't know what we'll wind up with next.
 
Teri: HealthNet.
 
Possibly. We've had HealthNet before and I'm considering them for medicare. This is being repeated in small companies across the country, I'm sure.
 
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?